Developer told to go back to drawing board over traffic safety fears at Derbyshire village housing site

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Proposed changes to a development of 90 homes that was only permitted on appeal have been turned down over traffic safety fears.

The development off Hallfieldgate Lane, Shirland, was initially refused by North East Derbyshire District Council on grounds that it would harm the character of the area and mean the loss of open space – a decision overturned by the Planning Inspectorate.

When applicants Trustees Of Ted Speed And Pauline Speed Hallfield Trust returned to the planning committee to vary the conditions of the permission and alter the layout, members raised concerns over the road safety, as well as the potential loss of a hedgerow and protected trees.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

They pointed out that a proposed new access point was in close proximity to an already busy junction at Lilac Way, and the applicant was using out of date traffic information, which didn’t take into account new houses being built nearby.

The development off Hallfieldgate Lane, Shirland, was initially refused by North East Derbyshire District Council on grounds that it would harm the character of the area and mean the loss of open space – a decision overturned by the Planning Inspectorate.The development off Hallfieldgate Lane, Shirland, was initially refused by North East Derbyshire District Council on grounds that it would harm the character of the area and mean the loss of open space – a decision overturned by the Planning Inspectorate.
The development off Hallfieldgate Lane, Shirland, was initially refused by North East Derbyshire District Council on grounds that it would harm the character of the area and mean the loss of open space – a decision overturned by the Planning Inspectorate.

Councillor Mark Foster said he did not oppose the ‘principle’ of the changes, but pointed out the planning inspector had imposed conditions, which would be scrapped if the amendments were accepted.

“It’s been through the process where it came locally and it’s been through a planning inspectorate,” he commented.

“The planning inspector has put those conditions on for a reason.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“It was looked at thoroughly the first time and proper regard was given to this, detailed regard.”

He said the changes were major and he believed the applicant needed to return to the authority with an entirely new application, rather than just varying the existing permission.

Related topics: