Column: Experiences when young can dictate how we function as adults
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Behind the work of Dickens was the view of the child introduced by the poetic movement known as ‘Romanticism’. It was put most succinctly by William Wordsworth: ‘The child is father of the man.’
The experiences we have when young dictate how we will function as adults.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdA Romantic poet to whom Dickens has been compared is William Blake. Like Dickens, Blake used his literary skills to condemn the inhumane treatment of children in his day.


Throughout the 18th and most of the 19th centuries in England, chimneys were swept by small children, known as ‘climbing boys’. The smaller the child, the better.
No protective clothing was supplied. Their heads were shaved.
Many of them died in the course of their work, or else were abandoned in the street and left to starve.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdFor Blake’s perspective, we might consider the second of two poems he wrote on the subject, both entitled ‘The Chimney Sweeper’ – this one being published in 1794.


The young sweep presented here has no illusions about his dreadful life. He protests that it was his own mother and father who sold him into a life of misery: ‘They clothed me in the clothes of death / And taught me to sing the notes of woe.’
When asked where they are, he bitterly reports that they are now attending church. They have ‘gone to praise God and his Priest and King,/Who make up a heaven of our misery.’
Blake was a spiritual revolutionary. He rejected the conventional God, whom he renamed as ‘Nobodaddy’. The only spiritual being whom he put his faith in was Jesus, who embodied liberation from all oppression, whether sacred or secular.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdBlake castigated the religious authorities of his day, condemning them for their indifference to the suffering of the poor – particularly children such as the one featured in the poem above.
Given Blake’s perspective, we might wonder, in the light of the appalling cases of child abuse which the contemporary church has allowed to continue over the decades, what kind of God do those clergy who are guilty either of abuse or of concealing abuse actually believe in?