Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Derbyshire Times site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Wind farm appeal blows up a storm!



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 July 2008
PROTESTERS and supporters were giv-en their last chance to put forward views on plans to build a controversial wind farm in the Derbyshire Dales as part of the final day of a planning inquiry.
The appeal looking at the proposal to install four 100m turbines came to a close on Friday after eight days and planning inspector Robin Brooks will now decide whether the application will go ahead.

The inquiry was being held after Carsington Wind
Energy appealed against Derbyshire Dales District Council's decision last year to refuse the plans.

During the meeting Janice Southway, from Protect Carsington and Hopton Action Group, said the group had collected 1,481 signatures, 770 letters and 56 emails against the proposals during a seven-week campaign.

She said the wind farm would have a harmful impact on tourism, heritage, noise, wildlife and the landscape. Ms Southway also criticised West Coast Energy's consultation process.

Anthony Crean QC, for Derbyshire Dales District Council, led a scathing attack on Carsington Wind Energy's plans.

He described the material the company had presented to the public as "wrong, inadequate and misleading."

Mr Crean also claimed West Coast Energy's environmental statement was "largely flawed", "invalid in law", and "massively exaggerates benefits". He said this alone was grounds for the inspector to refuse the appeal.

Mr Crean added: "The application fails on the central balance of benefit against harm. The benefit is trivial. The harm is massive."

But Jeremy Pike QC, for Carsington Wind Energy, said the district council's argument was based on the principle that if something could be seen, it was automatically harmful.

He said: "If this proposal is turned down on those views, no wind farm application can ever be deemed as being acceptable."

No date was set for the release of the planning inspector's final decision which will be made as part of an official report.



The full article contains 318 words and appears in Derbyshire Times newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 July 2008 4:36 PM
  • Source: Derbyshire Times
  • Location: Chesterfield
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Today's Vote

Do you think that fireworks should be banned from sale to the public?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.