Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Your views on MPs' expenses

To comment on these letters click below

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 June 2009
SIR — Further to the report (Derbyshire Times, June 25) about the expense claims of Chesterfield MP Paul Holmes, it shouldn't really be a surprise to discover that our MP spends so much money on digital cameras given that his party has always been more interested in presentation over substance.
This is why the Lib Dems continue to spend a small fortune publishing the council newspaper Our Town when most of the information contained in it could be made available on-line or in other local publications at a fraction of the cost.

The council also seems to be squandering council tax payers money on subscribing to organisations like Green Flag Awards which duly rewards council for their donations by handing them an a ward which guarantee councillors can get their pictures in the papers yet again.

Perhaps Paul Holmes should use one of his many cameras to take pictures of all the empty shops and market stalls in Chesterfield to show exactly what the Liberal Democrats have achieved whilst controlling the towns finances.

Crispin Fisher,
206 Hady Lane,
Chesterfield.

SIR — Paul Holmes says he has to 'buy food at commercial prices in London'.

The House of Commons is commonly known to have one of the cheapest eating arrangements in the whole country. And just in case he didn't know, at the last count there were 28 eateries in London that MPs have access to. They have extensive menus and they are all extremely heavily discounted.

For example, soup at 55p; main meals such as Scottish salmon with salad at £2.90; roast breast of Norfolk turkey with stuffing at £3.40 and a vast range of desserts from 60p.

If he's spending £25 a day of our money at these prices he is eating well.

ROY SMITH,
70 Church Street South, Chesterfield.

SIR — I was astounded to note that our MP Paul Holmes has claimed over £1,582.71 in total for permanent flooring on his rented Chesterfield office.

If some of the original floor covering was damaged in the flood of 2005 and needed replacing, surely it should be covered on his, or his landlord's insurance, just as his Lib Dem colleagues instructed those poor householders affected by the floods in 2007. It seems that normal rules don't apply when it's the taxpayer paying the bill.

JAMES GOLDING,
Grasscroft Close,
Chesterfield.

SIR — Am I the only person astonished at MP Natascha Engel's belief that her expenses claims are reasonable and fair as she tries to 'brazen' it out: eg settee £2,000!

How can she claim that this, and other claims, are necessary in 'carrying out her parliamentary duties'?

Start repaying quick Natascha or face the wrath of the public at the next General Election!

CONCERNED
CITIZEN,
Chesterfield.
Name and full address supplied.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2009 11:40 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Chesterfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

stevieboi1983,

Eastwood,notts 03/07/2009 14:28:32
Who does paul holmes think he is?

1st of all he has the audacity to slam and go on at government about the costs of the national concessionary

travel scheme to the council but then he has the nerve to

waste tax payers money on digital camera,s and as someone pointed in the comments box there are empty

stalls and markets in chesterfield what has he done for the people? at least people are gaining something through this travel scheme more than can be said for his mickey taking attitude when it comes to expenses EG at least the money spent on concessionary travel benefits everyone who is entitled
as opposed to his self centredness with regards his use of taxpayers money
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.